Publication, Research Openness, and Participant Protection

Arjona, A. M., Mampilly, Z. C., & Pearlman, W. (2019). Research in Violent or Post-Conflict Political Settings (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3333503). Social Science Research Network. [Link]   

Bleich, E., Pekkanen, R., Trachtenberg, M., Cramer, K., Shih, V., Parkinson, S., Wood, E. J., Pachirat, T., Romney, D., Stewart, B., Tingley, D. H., Davison, A., Schneider, C., Wagemann, C., & Fairfield, T. (2015). Transparency in Qualitative and Multi-Method Research: A Symposium. Qualitative & Multi-Method Research, 13(1). [PDF]  

Brigden, N. K., and Gohdes, A. R. (2020). “The Politics of Data Access in Studying Violence across Methodological Boundaries: What We Can Learn from Each Other?” International Studies Review, 22(2), 250–267. [Link]     

Fassin, D. (2015). ‘The Public Afterlife of Ethnography.’ American Ethnologist, 42(4), 592-609. [Link] 

Fujii, L. A. (2016). “The Dark Side of DA-RT.” Comparative Politics Newsletter, 26(1), 25-27.

Gault, M. (2020). “Photographs, Trauma and the Ownership of the Dead.” Writing the ‘Troubles’ (Blog). December 14. [Link] 

Gault, M. (2020). “Photographs, Trauma and the Ownership of the Dead.” Writing the ‘Troubles’ (Blog). December 14. [Link]  

Golder, M., & Golder, S. N. (Eds.). (2016). Symposium: Data Access and Research Transparency (DA-RT). Comparative Politics Newsletter, 26(1), 10-64. [PDF]   

Harper, Robin A. (2018). “Thinking about Journals, IRBs, and Research Partners (Interviewees).” Excerpt from a paper presented at WPSA, 2018. [PDF]  

Issa, Z., Camburn, J., Schenck-Yglesias, C., Almalla, M., & Jabbour, S. (2022). Who funds what? Humanitarian research and innovation funding flows analysis (pp. 1-59). Elrha. [Link]

Jacobs, Alan M., Tim Büthe, et. al. “The Qualitative Transparency Deliberations: Insights and Implications.” Perspectives on Politics 19, no. 1 (2021): 171–208. [PDF]

Jacobs, A. M., Buthe, T., Arjona, A. M., Arriola, L. R., Bellin, E., Bennett, A., Björkman, L., Bleich, E., Elkins, Z., Fairfield, T., Gaikwad, N., Chestnut Greitens, S., Hawkesworth, M., Herrera, V., Herrera, Y. M., Johnson, K. S., Karakoç, E., Koivu, K., Kreuzer, M., … Yashar, D. (2019). Transparency in Qualitative Research: An Overview of Key Findings and Implications of the Deliberations (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3430025). Social Science Research Network. [Link]  

Khan, S. (2019). “The Subpoena of Ethnographic Data.” Sociological Forum, 34(1): 253–63. [Link]

Krystalli, R. (2018). “Negotiating Data Management with the National Science Foundation: Transparency and Ethics in Research Relationships.” Memo. [PDF]  

Lake, M., Majic, S., & Maxwell, R. (2019). Research on Vulnerable and Marginalized Populations (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3333511). Social Science Research Network. [Link]    

Lynch, M. 2016. “Area Studies and the Cost of Prematurely Implementing DA-RT.” Comparative Politics Newsletter 26(1): 36–39. [PDF] 

McMurtrie, B. (2014). “Secrets from Belfast.” Chronicle of Higher Education, January 26. [Link]  

Morris MacLean, L., Posner, E., Thomson, S., & Wood, E. J. (2019). Research Ethics and Human Subjects: A Reflexive Openness Approach (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3332887). Social Science Research Network. [Link]  

Parkinson, S. E., & Wood, E. J. (2015). “Transparency in Intensive Research on Violence: Ethical Dilemmas and Unforeseen Consequences.” Qualitative & Multi-Method Research, 13(1), 22–27. [PDF]   

Shesterinina, A., Pollack, M. A., & Arriola, L. R. (2019). Evidence from Researcher Interactions with Human Participants (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3333392). Social Science Research Network. [Link]  

Shih, V. (2015). “Research in Authoritarian Regimes: Transparency Tradeoffs and Solutions.” Qualitative & Multi-Method Research, 13(1), 20–22. [Link]  

Sriram, C. (2009). “Maintenance of Standards of Protection during Writeup and Publication.” In C. Sriram et al. (Eds.), Surviving Field Research: Working in Violent and Difficult Situations (pp. 57–68). London & New York: Routledge. [Link]   

Tripp, A. M. (2018). “Transparency and Integrity in Conducting Field Research on Politics in Challenging Contexts.” Perspectives on Politics, 16(3), 728–738. [PDF]